Residents in Caracas cast their votes during the Venezuela Popular Consultation directly shaping neighborhood infrastructure and services   MR Online Residents in Caracas cast their votes during the Venezuela Popular Consultation, directly shaping neighborhood infrastructure and services.

4th Venezuela Popular Consultation: A decisive step toward grassroots democracy

Originally published: teleSUR English on November 23, 2025 (more by teleSUR English)  |

Venezuela is gearing up for its fourth Venezuela Popular Consultation, a nationwide participatory exercise through which citizens will directly choose 10,662 community projects set to begin implementation next week. These new initiatives will join the 23,000 projects already approved and executed over the past 18 months, reinforcing the government’s strategy of grassroots-driven development.

Organized under the framework of the Plan de las 7 Transformaciones 2025—2031, the Venezuela Popular Consultation seeks to decentralize decision-making and place local needs at the heart of public policy. The outcomes will determine which infrastructure, health, education, and cultural projects receive funding in each community, with results feeding directly into the formation of Comités Bolivarianos de Bases Integrales—integrated grassroots councils tasked with overseeing execution.

“This is not just voting—it’s governing,” said one community organizer in Barinas, echoing a sentiment repeated across the country. The consultation reflects Caracas’s long-standing emphasis on what it terms “protagonistic democracy,” a model that positions citizens not as passive recipients of state services but as active co-creators of policy.

The electoral machinery behind this participatory process is extensive. According to Minister Ángel Prado, over 19,926 Electoral Commissions have been activated nationwide to manage voting centers ahead of the 2025 electoral calendar, which includes three constitutional votes. These commissions—staffed by volunteer polling station members—are designed to ensure transparency and accessibility at the local level.

Of the 10,662 proposed projects up for selection in this fourth round, 50% (or 5,331 initiatives) are dedicated to public services, with significant allocations also targeting healthcare, education infrastructure, sports, recreation, culture, and communal economy. This distribution underscores the government’s focus on social welfare amid ongoing macroeconomic challenges.

Minister Vladimir Padrino López, head of the Ministry of Popular Power for Defense, announced that more than 170,000 personnel from the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) have been deployed across the national territory to保障 security and logistical support. He described the event as a “great democratic and popular festival”—a characterization meant to emphasize civic engagement over partisan politics.

Padrino López further stressed that despite what he called “economic, psychological, and external threats”—a clear reference to U.S. sanctions and geopolitical pressure—Venezuela remains committed to deepening a participatory, protagonistic, and direct democracy where “constituted power obeys the will of the people.”

The logistical scale is notable: from remote Andean villages to urban barrios in Caracas, citizens will gather at neighborhood assemblies or digital kiosks to cast their preferences. While the process is non-binding in a legal sense, authorities treat the outcomes as politically binding mandates, with ministries required to allocate resources accordingly.

The Venezuela Popular Consultation must be understood not only as a domestic policy tool but also as part of a broader geopolitical stance. In a region where liberal representative democracy has faced declining public trust, Caracas positions its model as an alternative to Western-centric governance paradigms.

This approach aligns with Venezuela’s long-term strategy of “civilian-military union” and community sovereignty, aimed at reducing dependence on traditional state bureaucracy and international financial institutions. By channeling resources through communes and directly elected base committees, the government seeks to insulate local development from both market volatility and foreign intervention.

Globally, this model resonates with movements advocating for deliberative democracy and economic self-determination, particularly in the Global South. At the same time, critics—particularly from U.S.-aligned think tanks—dismiss the consultations as performative exercises that lack independent oversight and reinforce one-party dominance.

Yet, regardless of interpretation, the process highlights a critical trend: the reconfiguration of sovereignty through localized, collective decision-making. In an era of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding worldwide, Venezuela’s experiment—however contested—offers a distinct vision of how power can be structured from the ground up.

Central to the Venezuela Popular Consultation is its integration with the communal economy, a pillar of the Plan de las 7 Transformaciones. Unlike traditional top-down development models, this framework treats communes as autonomous economic and political units capable of managing production, distribution, and social services.

Projects selected through the consultation often include urban agriculture cooperatives, community health clinics, cultural centers, and neighborhood water systems—initiatives designed to enhance resilience against external shocks, including sanctions and supply chain disruptions. Community members not only vote on projects but also participate in their design, budgeting, and monitoring, fostering a sense of collective ownership.

“It doesn’t matter your political preference,” stated a government communiqué released last week. “The power of the people is above partisanship.” This rhetoric aims to depoliticize the process and encourage broad participation, including from opposition-leaning communities that may otherwise disengage.

Indeed, evidence from previous consultations suggests that even in areas with strong anti-government sentiment, participation rates remain high when tangible improvements—like repaired roads or new schools—are linked to the vote. This pragmatic appeal may be key to the consultation’s endurance, transcending ideological divides in favor of immediate material gains.

Moreover, by involving all levels of government—from municipal to national—the model seeks to streamline bureaucratic bottlenecks and accelerate project execution. Ministries are required to “simplify, improve, and support” each communal proposal, creating a feedback loop between citizens and state institutions.

Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.