| US Flag | MR Online

The United States empire is almost always at war

Originally published: Pearls and Irritations on November 5, 2024 by John Menadue (more by Pearls and Irritations) (Posted Nov 06, 2024)

This article was first published on December 30, 2021 and now slightly updated.

Apart from brief isolationist periods, the U.S. has been almost perpetually at war. The greatest military risk we run is acting as a proxy for the U.S. in its dispute with China. China is not a threat to Australia but the U.S. is as we have locked ourselves into the U.S. war machine. The Deputy Secretary of the U.S. State Department boasts that we are locked in for the next 40 years.

The record is clear. Time and time again we have allowed ourselves to be drawn into the imperial wars of  the UK and then the U.S. We have forfeited our strategic autonomy.

Over two centuries, the U.S. has subverted and overthrown numerous governments. It has a military and business complex that depends on war for influence and enrichment. It funds our War Memorial and the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and many other fronts for U.S. military and business interests.

The U.S. assumes a moral superiority it denies to others.

Many of our political, bureaucratic, business and media elites have been on an American drip feed for so long they find it hard to think of the world without American global hegemony. They have been groomed by Washington for decades.

We had a similar and dependant view of the UK in the past. That ended in tears in Singapore. It will be much worse for us now that so much of our country has been colonised by the U.S. military.

In this blog (Is war in the American DNA?), I have drawn attention repeatedly to the risks we run in being “joined at the hip” to a country that is almost always at war. The facts are clear. The U.S. has never had a decade without war. Since its founding in 1776, the U.S. has been at war 93 per cent of the time. These wars have extended from its own hemisphere to the Pacific, to Europe and most recently to the Middle East. The U.S. has launched 201 out of 248 armed conflicts since the end of World War II. In recent decades most of these wars have been unsuccessful. The U.S. maintains 800 military bases or sites around the world, including in Australia. The U.S. has in our region a massive deployment of hardware and troops in Japan, the Republic of Korea and Guam. China has one off shore naval base in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa to combat pirates.

Just think of the U.S. frenzy if China had a string of bases in the Caribbean or its ships patrolled the Florida Keys.

The U.S. has been meddling extensively in other countries’ affairs and elections for a century. It tried to change other countries’ governments 72 times during the Cold War. Many foreign leaders were assassinated. In the piece reproduced in this blog (The fatal expense of U.S. Imperialism), Professor Jeffrey Sachs said:

The scale of U.S. military operations is remarkable … The U.S. has a long history of using covert and overt means to overthrow governments deemed to be unfriendly to the U.S. … Historian John Coatsworth counts 41 cases of successful U.S.-led regime change for an average of one government overthrow by the U.S. every 28 months for centuries.

The overthrow or interference in foreign governments is diverse, including Honduras, Guatemala, Iran, Haiti, Congo, Indonesia, Japan, Vietnam, Chile, Iraq, Afghanistan and most recently, Syria. Assassination of opponents who disagree is normalised both by the U.S. and rogue states like Israel.

And this interference continued with the undermining of the pro-Russian government in Ukraine by the U.S.-backed Maidan coup in 2014. Gorbachev and Reagan agreed that in allowing the reunification of Germany, NATO would not extend eastwards. But with U.S. encouragement, NATO has now provocatively extended right up to the borders of Russia. Not surprisingly, Russia is resisting.

The U.S. encouraged and helped finance the “democratic” insurrection in Hong Kong. It almost succeeded.

Despite all the evidence of wars and meddling, the American Imperium continues without serious check or query in America or Australia. That imperialism is best reflected in the Monroe Doctrine, that America can interfere anywhere  around the world at any time. And allies are expected to follow.

I suggest several reasons why this record has not been challenged.

The first is what is often described as America’s  ‘exceptionalism’, its ‘manifest destiny’. Numerous elitist Americans believe they are the chosen people. They see themselves as more virtuous and their system of government better than others.

The ignorance and parochialism of ordinary America and its politicians of other countries is legendary but possibly just as important is their resistance to any relief of ignorance. That may not seem unusual–but it is dangerous for a country with overwhelming military power employed around the globe.

Anyone who has been stuck with a travel group of  parochial Texans will know what I mean!!

The second reason why the American Imperium continues largely unchecked is the power of what president Dwight Eisenhower once called the “military and industrial complex” in the U.S. In 2021 I would add “politicians” who depend heavily on funding from powerful arms manufacturers and military and civilian personnel in more than 4,000 military facilities. Congress dares not cut the military budget. As James Curran in the AFR this week put it,’It is going to take a determined President to take on the the U.S. military-industrial complex, so deeply imbedded as it is in so many Congressional districts across the US’.

The Australian intelligence community and many universities and think tanks also have a vested interest in the American Imperium.

This complex co-opts institutions and individuals around the globe. It has enormous influence. No U.S. president, nor for that matter any Australian prime minister, would likely challenge it.

Australia has locked itself into this complex. Our military and defence leaders are heavily dependent on the U.S. Departments of Defense and State, the CIA and the FBI for advice. We act as their branch offices.

But it goes beyond advice. We willingly respond and join the U.S. in disasters like Iraq and the Middle East. While the UN General Assembly votes with large majorities on nuclear proliferation and most recently on Gaza, we remain locked into the position of the U.S. and a few of its mendicants.

Our autonomy and independence are also at great risk because our defence/security elites in Canberra have as their holy grail the concept of “interoperability” with the U.S. This is mirrored in U.S. official and think-tank commentary on the role they see for us in our region. So powerful is the U.S. influence and our willing cooperation that our foreign policies have been largely emasculated and sidelined by the Defence and security views of both the U.S. and their media acolytes in Australia. Our security agencies like our Office of National Intelligence is highly dependent on CIA input. It has in effect been colonised by U.S. intelligence agencies. Our Prime Minister listens more to Andrew Shearer the head of ONI than Penny Wong, his Foreign Minister,

The concept of interoperability does not only mean equipment. It also means personnel, with increasingly large numbers of Australian military personnel embedded in the U.S. military and defence establishments, especially in the Pacific Command in Hawaii.

The U.S. military and industrial complex and its associates have a vested interest in America being at war and our defence establishment, Department of Defence, ADF, Australian Strategic Policy Institute and others are locked-in American loyalists.

The third reason for the continuing dominance of the American Imperium is the way the U.S. expects others to abide by a “rules-based international order” that was largely determined at Bretton Woods after World War II and embedded in various UN agencies. That ‘order’ reflects the power and views of the dominant countries in the 1940s. It does not recognise the legitimate interests of such newly emerging countries as China, which now insist on playing a part in an international rules-based order.

The U.S. only follows an international rules-based order when it suits its own interests. Just consider the wholesale rejection of International rules over Gaza by the U.S. and Israel.  What hypocrisy! And Richard Marles chants a Rule Based International Order at every opportunity. He is unable to understand that it is U.S. rules that he parrots on about. He is a very slow learner.

The U.S. cherry picks the rules that best suite it at the time. It is wrecking the WTO. It pushes for a rules-based system in the South China Sea while refusing to endorse UNCLOS (Law of the Sea) or accept ICJ decisions. The invasion of Iraq was a classic case of breaking the rules. It was illegal. The resultant death and destruction in Iraq met the criteria for war crimes. But the culprits have got off scot-free. Only Tony Blair has suffered reputational damage.

It is a myth that democracies like America will behave internationally at a higher level of morality. Countries act in their own interests as they perceive them. We need to discount the noble ideas espoused by Americans on how they run their own country on the domestic front and look instead at how they treat other countries.

The U.S. claims about how well they run their own country are challenged on so many fronts. Alongside great wealth and privilege, over 40 million U.S. citizens live in poverty, they have a massive prison population with its indelible racist connotations, guns are ubiquitous and they refuse to address the issue. Violence is as American as cherry pie. It is embedded in U.S. behaviour both at home and abroad. Donald Trump incited an attack on the Capitol.

The founding documents of the U.S. inspire Americans and many people throughout the world. “The land of the free and the home of the brave” still has a clarion call. Unfortunately, those core values have often been denied to others. When the Philippines sought U.S. support it was invaded instead. Ho Chi Minh wanted U.S. support for independence but Vietnam was invaded.

Like many democracies, including our own, money, media and vested interests are corrupting public life. ‘Democracy’ in the U.S. has been replaced by ‘Donocracy’, with practically no restrictions on funding of elections and political lobbying for decades. House of Representatives electorates are gerrymandered and poor and minority group voters  excluded from the rolls. The powerful Jewish lobby, supported by fundamentalist Christians, has run U.S. policy off the rails on Israel and the Middle East. The powerful private health insurance industry has mired the U.S. in the most expensive and inefficient health services in the world.

The U.S. Congress is crippled and the Supreme Court is stacked.

Many democracies are in trouble. U.S. democracy is in more trouble than most. There is a pervasive sickness.

A major voice in articulating American extremism and the American Imperium is Fox News and Rupert Murdoch who exert their influence not just in America but also in the UK and Australia. Fox News supported the invasion of Iraq and is mindless of the terrible consequences. Rupert Murdoch applauded the invasion of Iraq because it would reduce oil prices. Fox and News Corp are leading sceptics on climate change which threatens our planet.

But it is not just the destructive role of News Corp in the U.S., UK and Australia. Our media, including the ABC are so derivative. It is so pervasive and extensive, we don’t recognise it for its very nature. We really do have a ‘white man’s media’. We see it most obviously today in the way legacy media spew out an endless daily conveyor belt of anti-China stories. Without exception Australian media cheer on U.S. military imperialism. Incessant Washington propaganda is accepted without scrutiny.

We have become ‘Americanised’ in so many ways and in ways that are very dangerous for us.

Despite continual criminal and often unsuccessful wars, assassinations, the overthrow or subversion of foreign governments and declining U.S. economic influence, U.S. hegemony and domination of Australian thinking continues. Despite all the evidence, why do we continue in denial?

One reason is that as a small, isolated and predominantly white community in Asia we have historically sought an outside protector, first the UK and when that failed, the U.S. The colonial mind set is still with us.

We are often told that we have shared values and common institutions first with the UK and now with the U.S. But countries will always act first in their own interests as Australian farmers found out as the U.S. grabbed our markets in China. Hardly protecting our back!

Another reason why we are in denial about the American Imperium, is, as I have described, the saturation of our media with U.S. news, views and entertainment. We do not have an independent media. Whatever the U.S. media says about China or defence will inevitably gets a good run in our derivative media. Our legacy media are staging posts for Washington propaganda.

A further reason for the continuing U.S. hegemony in Australian attitudes is the seduction of Australian opinion leaders over decades who have benefitted from American largesse and support—in the media, politics, bureaucracy, business, trade unions, universities and think-tanks. Thousands of influential Australians have been co-opted and groomed by U.S. money and support in travel, ‘dialogues’, study centres and think tanks. They are on the Washington drip feed.

Senior personnel in the U.S. Studies Centre at the University of Sydney authored our Defence Strategic Review.  Can anything be more brazen than that! U.S. Admirals were secretly positioned in our Defence Department. We only learned of it in U.S. media. And it goes on and on.

China is a minor player along side the U.S. in influence. Israel also has enormous influence in media and politics.

In so far as China is a threat it would be much less so if we were not so subservient to the U.S. The great risk of war with China is if we continue to act as a proxy for the U.S. Pine Gap would be the first Chinese target. Then there would be Darwin, Tindal and Perth.

In the past we could tag along at U.S. bidding without much strategic risk to ourselves. That is no longer the case. Acting as a proxy for continual U.S. taunting of China we are at risk. China is no direct threat to Australia. But as a proxy for the U.S., the most violent and aggressive country in history, we are putting ourselves at grave risk.

We are a nation in denial that we are ‘joined at the hip’ to a dangerous ,erratic and risky ally. Apart from brief isolationist periods, the U.S. has been almost perpetually at war.

Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.