• Monthly Review
  • Monthly Review Press
  • MR (Castilian)
  • Climate & Capitalism
  • Money on the Left
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Mastadon
MR Online
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact/Submission
  • Browse
    • Recent Articles Archive
    • by Subject
      • Ecology
      • Education
      • Imperialism
      • Inequality
      • Labor
      • Literature
      • Marxism
      • Movements
      • Philosophy
      • Political Economy
    • by Region
      • Africa
      • Americas
      • Asia
      • Australasia
      • Europe
      • Global
      • Middle East
    • by Category
      • Art
      • Commentary
      • Interview
      • Letter
      • News
      • Newswire
  • Monthly Review Essays
| Chris Jordan USA Crushed Cars 2 Tacoma 2004 | MR Online Chris Jordan (USA), Crushed Cars #2 Tacoma, 2004.

Will the people with guns allow our Planet to breathe: The Forty-Fourth Newsletter (2021)

By Vijay Prashad (Posted Nov 05, 2021)

Originally published: Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research on November 4, 2021 (more by Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research)  |
Climate Change, Environment, Movements, StrategyGlobalNewswireTricontinental Newsletter, United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26)

Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

It is perhaps fitting that United States President Joe Biden arrived in Glasgow for the 26th Conference of Parties (COP26) on the climate catastrophe with eighty-five cars in tow months after declaring ‘I’m a car guy’ (for details on the climate catastrophe, see our Red Alert no. 11, ‘Only One Earth’). Only three countries in the world have more cars per person than the U.S., and these countries (Finland, Andorra, and Italy) have a much smaller population than the United States.

| Francesco Clemente Italy Sixteen Amulets for the Road XII 2012 2013 | MR Online

Francesco Clemente (Italy), Sixteen Amulets for the Road (XII), 2012-2013.

Just before Biden left for the G20 summit, his meeting with Pope Francis, and COP26, he had his administration pressure the oil-producing states (OPEC+) to ‘do the needful when it comes to supply’–namely to increase oil production. While the U.S. pressured OPEC+ to boost oil production, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) released its key report on global emissions. UNEP pointed out that the G20 countries account for close to 80% of global greenhouse gases and that the three highest per capita major carbon emitters are Saudi Arabia, Australia, and the United States. Since the populations of Saudi Arabia (34 million) and Australia (26 million) are so much smaller than that of the United States (330 million), it is clear that the U.S. emits much greater volumes of CO2 than these other two countries: Australia accounts for 1.2% of global carbon emissions, while Saudi Arabia accounts for 1.8%, and the United States 14.8%.

Before the Glasgow meeting, the G20 leaders convened in Rome to firm up their own approach towards the climate catastrophe. The communiqué that emerged from this meeting, ‘G20 Rome Leaders’ Declaration’, was tepid, using terms like ‘make progress’, ‘strengthen actions’, and ‘scale up’. According to the report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), unless carbon emissions are reduced, it is unlikely that the key goal of having no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming compared to pre-industrial levels will be met. The IPCC notes that there is an 83% chance of reaching that target if carbon emissions are reduced to 300 gigatons from now to the time that we achieve net-zero carbon emissions (there are currently 35 gigatons of annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuels). There is only a 17% chance of reaching a global temperature increase of no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius if we can only reduce emissions to 900 gigatons. The IPCC suggests that the faster the world moves to net-zero emissions, the better the chance of preventing catastrophic levels of warming.

At the 2015 COP21 meeting in Paris, none of the powerful countries would even utter the phrase ‘net-zero emissions’. Now, thanks to the work of the IPCC reports and to the mass campaigns around the world on the climate emergency, the phrase is forced into the mouths of leaders who would prefer to be ‘car guys’. Though the need to move to zero carbon emissions by 2050 has been on the table for some years, the G20 statement ignored this and chose the vague formulation that net emissions must end ‘by or around mid-century’. There was also little appetite to talk about global methane emissions, which are the second most abundant anthropogenic greenhouse gas after CO2.

| Iwan Suastika Indonesia The Beauty and the Fragile Ones Planet Earth 2020 | MR Online

Iwan Suastika (Indonesia), The Beauty and the Fragile Ones (Planet Earth), 2020.

In the days before the COP26 meeting, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said, ‘It is time to put empty speeches, broken promises, and unfulfilled pledges behind us. We need laws to be passed, programmes to be implemented, and investments to be swiftly and properly funded, without further delay’. However, there has been a delay since the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. Picking up on the UN Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm (1972), the countries of the world pledged to do two things: reverse the degradation of the environment and recognise the ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ of developed and developing countries. It was clear that developed countries–mainly the West, the old colonial powers–had used up far more than their share of the ‘carbon budget’, while developing countries had not contributed nearly as much to the climate catastrophe and struggled to fulfil their basic obligations to their populations.

The Rio formula–common and differentiated responsibilities–hung over the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the Paris Accords (2015). Promises were made but not met. Developed countries promised what began to be called ‘climate finance’ both to mitigate the disastrous outcomes of the climate catastrophe and to shift reliance upon carbon-based energy to other forms of energy. The Green Climate Fund has remained far smaller than the annual $100 billion commitment pledged in 2009. The Rome G20 meeting did not come to any consensus on the empty bucket; meanwhile, it is important to recognise the stark contrast that, during the pandemic, a total of $16 trillion in fiscal stimulus was disbursed between March 2020 and March 2021, mainly in the developed countries. Given the improbability of a serious discussion about climate finance taking place, it is likely that COP26 will be a failure.

| He Neng China Waterfront 1986 | MR Online

He Neng (China), Waterfront, 1986.

Tragically, the COP26 process has been swept into the matrix of dangerous geopolitical tensions, driven largely by the United States in its quest to prevent China’s scientific and technological advancement. Coal is at the centre of the debate, with the argument being made that unless China and India cut back on their coal-fired power plants, no carbon reduction will be possible. At the United Nations in September, China’s President Xi Jinping said, ‘China will strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060’; he also stated that China would ‘not build new coal-fired plants overseas’. This was a monumental statement, far ahead of any of the pledges made by the other major global powers. Rather than build on this commitment, the debate driven by the West has largely been to malign developing countries, including China, and blame them for the climate catastrophe.

Looking at the IPCC evidence, economist John Ross recently showed that, according to the United States’ own proposal to reduce current emissions by 50-52% from 2005 levels, the country’s level of per capita CO2 emissions would still make up 220% of the global average in 2030. If the U.S. were to reach its goal, the country’s per capita carbon emissions in 2030 would be 42% higher than China’s are today. The U.S. has suggested that it would like to see a 50% reduction of emissions by 2030; since it would take the baseline at the uneven present levels of emissions, it would be allowed to emit 8.0 tonnes of CO2, China would be entitled to 3.7 tonnes, Brazil to 1.2 tonnes, India to 1.0 tonnes, and the Democratic Republic of Congo to 0.02 tonnes. As it stands, Ross shows, China’s per capita CO2 emissions are only 46% of U.S. emissions, while other developing countries emit far less (Indonesia, 15%; Brazil, 14%; India, 12%). For further details, please follow the Climate Equity Monitor developed by the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation and the National Institute of Advanced Studies (Bengaluru, India).

Rather than focus on the necessary energy transition, developed countries have taken to crude propaganda against a handful of developing states such as China and India. The Energy Transition Commission’s Making Mission Possible:Delivering a Net-Zero Economy report estimates that the cost of a transition will be 0.5% of global GDP by 2050, an insignificant amount compared to the catastrophic alternatives such as the disappearance of several small island nations and increasing wildly erratic weather patterns.

| Victor Ehikhamenor Nigeria Child of the Sky VII 2015 | MR Online

Victor Ehikhamenor (Nigeria), Child of the Sky VII, 2015.

The cost of the transition has decreased because of the decline in the costs of key technologies (onshore wind farms, solar photovoltaic cells, batteries, etc.). However, it is important to recognise that these costs are kept artificially low because of the very low wages paid to miners of key minerals and metals that power these technologies (such as cobalt miners in the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and because of the paltry royalty payments collected by countries of the South for these raw materials. If the real costs were paid, the transition would be more expensive, and the countries of the South would have resources to pay for the shift without reliance upon the climate fund.

Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research will be in Glasgow along with delegates from the International Peoples’ Assembly. We will be at various events to gauge the sentiment of people’s movements. At the conference, Nnimmo Bassey of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (Benin City, Nigeria) and I spoke about the catastrophe together. Bassey wrote a powerful poem, ‘Return to Being’, extracted here:

The battle rages
Who must gobble up the carbon budget,
Wrap Mother Earth in endless bales of smog?
Whose task is to pile the climate debt
And whose lot to be the carbon slave?
Colonise the biosphere
Obliterate the ethnosphere
Hopes mapped in colonial geographies of death
Scarified for sport, booby-trapped, and floating on blood

…

The dream is gone, the cock has crowed,
The betrayer seeks a branch to ape a pendulum swing
And one or two shed a tear for the press
As the hawk glides softly on the winds of the dirge seeking a hapless prey
Funeral drums burst by pulsating biceps of pain
Flutes whisper a dirge long forgotten suddenly emerging from the depths of years of erased histories
As daughters and sons of the soil pick up pieces of sacred hills, rivers, forests
Mother Earth awakes, embraces her visible and invisible children
And finally humans return to being.

Warmly,

Vijay

Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.

About Vijay Prashad

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He is a senior non-resident fellow at Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and (with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. Power.
Tricontinental Newsletter United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26)
Facebook does the U.S. government’s censorship work in Nicaraguan elections
Manufacturing ignorance: keeping the public away from power
  • Also by Vijay Prashad

    • Resurrecting the concept of the Triad: The Twenty-Second Newsletter (2023) by Vijay Prashad June 03, 2023
    • The Group of Seven should finally be shut down: The Twenty-First Newsletter (2023) by Vijay Prashad May 27, 2023
    • Can the Global South build a new world information and communication order?: The Twentieth Newsletter (2023) by Vijay Prashad May 19, 2023
    • The work that Tricontinental does: The Nineteenth Newsletter (2023) by Vijay Prashad May 13, 2023
  • Also By Vijay Prashad in Monthly Review Magazine

    • Africa Is on the Move May 01, 2022
    • Preface January 01, 2022
    • Introduction January 01, 2022
    • Quid Pro Quo? October 01, 2011
    • Reclaim the Neighborhood, Change the World December 01, 2007
    • Kathy Kelly’s Chispa December 01, 2005

    Books By Vijay Prashad

    • Washington’s New Cold War: A Socialist Perspective November 15, 2022
    • Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations September 16, 2020

    Monthly Review Essays

    • Ruy Mauro Marini’s Contribution to the Political Economy of Imperialism
      Torkil Lauesen | | MR Online

      In “The Dialectics of Dependency,” Ruy Mauro Marini developed a theory of dependency and unequal exchange that is still invaluable today.

    Lost & Found

    • The Political Tragedy of Capitalist Rule
      Harry Magdoff | ON THE FEDERATION OF ECONOMIC COMMUNES ENGELS AND DÜHRING | MR Online

      Society is made up of parts that work together, sometimes more and sometimes less successfully, to produce its livelihood and reproduce itself.

    Trending

    Popular (last 30 days)

    RSS MR Press News

    • WATCH: The Korean Policy Institute on Izzy Stone’s classic, MRP’s first ever book June 2, 2023
    • American exceptionalism on trial (Endless Holocausts reviewed in ‘Covert Action’) June 2, 2023
    • The first war the U.S. lost: Korea, not forgotten, hidden (Tim Beal in ‘Pearls and Irritations’) June 1, 2023
    • A careful accounting of capital and resistance (Socialist Register 2023 reviewed in ‘The Bullet’) May 30, 2023
    • Cold War 2.0: The Military-Industrial Complex Survives (Washington’s New Cold War reviewed by ‘The Populist’) May 22, 2023

    RSS Climate & Capitalism

    • Industrial farming has killed billions of birds June 6, 2023
    • Coverup: Industry hid dangers of ‘forever chemicals’ June 1, 2023
    • The ‘net zero’ hoax: Chevron’s fraudulent climate plan exposed May 24, 2023
    • Ecological ruin or ecological revolution? May 22, 2023
    • Global heat will hit new records in next five years May 17, 2023

     

    RSS Monthly Review

    • June 2023 (Volume 75, Number 2) June 1, 2023 The Editors
    • Engels and the Second Foundation of Marxism June 1, 2023 John Bellamy Foster
    • The Myth of 1968 Thought and the French Intelligentsia: Historical Commodity Fetishism and Ideological Rollback June 1, 2023 Gabriel Rockhill
    • The Disinformation Wars: An Epistemological, Political, and Socio-Historical Interrogation June 1, 2023 Helena Sheehan
    • The Dynamics of Rural Capitalist Accumulation in Post-Land Reform Zimbabwe June 1, 2023 George T. Mudimu

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Creative Commons License

    Monthly Review Foundation
    134 W 29TH ST STE 706
    New York NY 10001-5304

    Tel: 212-691-2555