How Do You Spell “Success”?  A Look at “Internal Devaluation” in Greece, Latvia, and Argentina

As of today the idea that Greece might be better off leaving the Euro and renegotiating its debt is considered by many to be unthinkable.  Instead, the country is embarking upon a program of “internal devaluation” — in which it keeps the Euro and lowers its real exchange rate by creating enough unemployment to drive down the country’s wages and prices.

Let’s compare this process to two other countries that have tried it — one which abandoned it after three and a half years — Argentina — and one that is continuing it — Latvia.

First, Greece: Figure 1 shows the IMF’s April 2010 projections for real (inflation-adjusted) GDP.  Note that in 2015, Greece still does not reach its pre-crisis (2008) level of GDP.  However, these projections are already out of date; the current projections from the Greek Finance Ministry show a 4 percent decline for 2010, whereas the IMF’s projections had only shown a 2 percent drop.  Moreover, it will most likely be worse; when Latvia began its “internal devaluation” in 2008, the IMF projected a 5 percent drop in GDP for 2009; it came in at more than 18 percent.  Result: Greece will probably need at least 8 or 9 years, if things go well under the current program, to reach pre-crisis output.

Figure 1

Second, Latvia: As can be seen in Figure 2, Latvia — which set a world-historic record in 2008-2009 by losing more than 25 percent of GDP — is not expected to reach even its 2006 level of GDP in 2015.  And in 2015, it is still 16 percent below its pre-crisis peak in 2007. Result: well over a decade to return to pre-crisis GDP, barring unforeseen negative events.

Figure 2

Sources for Figures 1 and 2: IMF International Financial Statistics and World Economic Outlook.

Third, Argentina: Figure 3 shows Argentina’s recession beginning in the middle of 1998.  Argentina tried the “internal devaluation” process — its currency was pegged at 1 to 1 to the dollar — until the end of 2001, leading to an economic and financial collapse.  In December 2001-January 2002, the government defaulted on its debt and abandoned the fixed exchange rate.  Result: after the default/devaluation, the economy continued to shrink for just one quarter (first quarter 2002).  It then grew and passed up its pre-crisis peak within three years of the default and devaluation, with real (inflation-adjusted) growth of 63 percent over 6 years.

Figure 3

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, República Argentina.

Conclusion: before making a commitment to indefinite recession and slow recovery, including many years of high unemployment and other social costs, Greece may want to consider the alternatives.  They may be less painful and allow for a speedier, more robust economic recovery.

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C.  He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan.  He has written numerous research papers on economic policy, especially on Latin America and international economic policy.  He is also co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000) and president of Just Foreign Policy.  This article was first published in the Guardian on 18 May 2010 and republished by CEPR under a Creative Commons license.

| Print