• Monthly Review
  • Monthly Review Press
  • MR (Castilian)
  • Climate & Capitalism
  • Money on the Left
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
MR Online
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact/Submission
  • Browse
    • Recent Articles Archive
    • by Subject
      • Ecology
      • Education
      • Imperialism
      • Inequality
      • Labor
      • Literature
      • Marxism
      • Movements
      • Philosophy
      • Political Economy
    • by Region
      • Africa
      • Americas
      • Asia
      • Australasia
      • Europe
      • Global
      • Middle East
    • by Category
      • Art
      • Commentary
      • Interview
      • Letter
      • News
      • Newswire
  • Monthly Review Essays
| La servidumbre | MR Online Sandra Eleta (Panama), La servidumbre, 1978-79.

Women everywhere in the World are squeezed into a tight corner: The Twenty-Seventh Newsletter (2021)

By Vijay Prashad (Posted Jul 09, 2021)

Originally published: Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research on July 8, 2021 (more by Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research)  |
Feminism, Financialization, Inequality, LaborGlobalNewswireTricontinental Newsletter

Dear friends,

| La servidumbre | MR Online

Sandra Eleta (Panama), La servidumbre, 1978-79.

Greetings from the desk of the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

Between 30 June and 2 July 2021, the United Nations and other multilateral organisations held the Generation Equality Forum in Paris (France). The forum was held to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action set out at the Fourth World Conference on Women (1995). Re-reading the Beijing Platform shows that rather than advance the cause of justice and equality, many countries have slipped backwards. Critical areas of concern to be addressed included the following:

  • The burden of poverty on women.
  • Inequalities and inadequacies in access to education, training, healthcare, employment, and decision-making.
  • Violence against women, including the grave dangers for women in armed conflict.
  • Lack of respect for women as well as inadequate promotion and protection of women’s human rights.
  • Persistent discrimination against and violations of the rights of the girl child.
  • Insufficient mechanisms at all levels to promote the advancement of women.
| In the Street | MR Online

Olga Rozanova (Russia), In the Street, 1915.

As part of the forum held in Paris last week, a group of agencies–including the World Health Organisation (WHO)–released a set of twelve papers that considered developments in the past twenty-five years, with an emphasis on the social impact of the pandemic. The lead paper notes that it ‘is disheartening that still not one country can claim to have achieved gender equality’. Furthermore, ‘the COVID-19 pandemic has been a serious setback for gender equality and women’s health’. Some key requirements for a way forward emerge out of these twelve papers:

  1. ‘The first requirement is that paid employment and unpaid care work are valued equally, recognising the fact that many women are not employed or work in informal sectors and that women bear a disproportionate burden of unpaid care work’.
  2. Universal coverage for healthcare is necessary, with comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare included in the coverage.
  3. Universal social protections should include provisions for childcare, paid parental, sick, and family care leave, and a pension for the elderly.
  4. Women’s movements must be supported, and women must participate fully in the construction of policies in all sectors of society. Reflecting on the role of women in politics and government, the head of UN Women, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, told the forum, ‘Women make up one quarter of those who are managers, they are one quarter of parliamentarians around the world, they are one quarter of those who negotiate climate change, they are less than one quarter of those who negotiate peace agreements. All these decisions have a fundamental impact on their capacity to have a life that is meaningful’.
| Escena revolucionaria | MR Online

Aurora Reyes Flores (Mexico), Escena revolucionaria, 1935.

Last year, in a major report, UN Women concluded that the gains made over the past quarter century have been eroded. The main drivers of this reversal are a combination of the climate emergency, cruel austerity policies, conflict, violence, the ‘rise of exclusionary politics, characterised by misogyny and xenophobia’, the entire care economy being held up by women, and other factors. These reasons are now compounded by the pandemic, which–as our study CoronaShock and Patriarchy showed–has hit women very hard.

Of the many important points, here are some to consider:

  1. 510 million women around the world–about 40% of all working women–are employed in the sectors hit hardest by the pandemic, such as entertainment, food service, hospitality, manufacturing, and tourism.
  2. Women are disproportionately found in the informal sector (60%), where they do not receive social and economic protections.
  3. Women have been more likely than men to lose their jobs during the pandemic.
  4. During the pandemic, at least 64 million women lost their jobs, with an income decline of at least $800 billion. This does not include women in the informal sector, which is the main arena for working women in southern Asia and in Africa.
  5. Studies from around the world show that women had to cut back on their hours of employment due to increased care obligations during the pandemic and that these cuts impact long-term pay and pensions. This also impacts the ability of women to return to work and often results in a greater increase in care work in the long term. Furthermore, as the International Labour Organisation points out, ‘women are not only hit by the loss of jobs but also by expenditure cuts that contract public service provision, in particular care services’.
  6. A survey by UNAIDS found that 47% of LGBTQIA+ respondents faced economic difficulty, with ‘a quarter unable to meet their basic needs, skipping meals, or reducing meal sizes’.
| Agony | MR Online

Colette Omogbai (Nigeria), Agony, 1963.

Hidden in the shadows of these reports are the realities of women who live in rural areas. In India, for instance, rural women make up 81.29% of the female workforce, but only 12.9% of women hold land. Most of these women are landless agricultural workers or informal sector workers. During the most recent wave of the pandemic to strike India, 5.7 million rural women’s jobs vanished in April 2021; this job loss accounts for nearly 80% of all job losses that month. Recoveries in May were anaemic. The Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research dossier on the farmers’ revolt is important reading for the context of the crisis in rural India. Nikore Associates, based in Delhi, offered four reasons for the crisis experienced by rural women:

  1. In rural India, before the pandemic, women spent 5.017 hours per day on unpaid care work; in comparison, men spent 1.67 hours per day. During the pandemic, as family members fell ill, the compulsion of care work fell on the shoulders of women.
  2. Due to the lockdowns and other pressures, women–who supplemented their incomes by trading goods and agricultural produce, including selling fish–found it difficult to go to the markets.
  3. Women had been important beneficiaries of the government’s rural work scheme (MNREGA), which saw an almost 35% reduction in the government’s 2020-21 budget. In April-May 2021, jobs provided through this scheme fell by 21%.
  4. Women who worked in the handicraft and small industries sector–including through piece-rate and home-based production–saw the sector stutter during the second wave and fail to make any recovery in the months since then.

At the Paris meeting, UN Women’s Mlambo-Ngcuka said, ‘Women everywhere in the world are squeezed into a small corner’. But they are, of course, fighting back. Across the world, trade unions and agricultural unions, women’s organisations and human rights groups, as well as political parties of the Left are pushing back, stepping out of the corner, and seeking to put the agenda of working women on the table. The demands being made are basic. Eighteen of them are at the end of CoronaShock and Patriarchy study. Here is a summary, condensed into eight demands:

  1. Nominate leaders of working-class women’s organisations to influential bodies that shape policy.
  2. Recognise and count informal women workers in national accounts.
  3. Ensure that informal workers have basic workplace protections.
  4. Provide immediate cash relief and food relief to women workers.
  5. Provide immediate healthcare coverage to all workers.
  6. Place a moratorium on rent and utilities payments.
  7. Enhance social protection systems, including child and elder care programmes.
  8. Provide credit to women’s cooperatives.
| Chen Muhua | MR Online

Chen Muhua (1921-2011)

In 1995, the delegates elected Chen Muhua (1921-2011) as the president of the UN World Conference on Women. In 1938, Chen went to Yan’an to join the communist revolution, studying at Kàngda and helping to build the economic resilience of the base areas. After 1949, Chen worked in the Communist Party (rising to be an alternate Politburo member), in the Chinese state (becoming the governor of the People’s Bank of China), and in the women’s movement (leading the All-China Women’s Federation). At the Beijing Conference, Chen made a strong plea for the emancipation of women. ‘It is evident that women are crying out for an improvement in their status. The times demand it. Humanity aspires to it’.

Warmly,

Vijay

Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.

About Vijay Prashad

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than twenty books, including The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World (The New Press, 2007), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013), The Death of the Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016) and Red Star Over the Third World (LeftWord, 2017). He writes regularly for Frontline, the Hindu, Newsclick, AlterNet and BirGün.
Tricontinental Newsletter
Why are children suffering from hunger in Ukraine?
Exposing police lies to destroy the legacy of Kwame Ture
  • Also by Vijay Prashad

    • There are hungry people. There are hungry people: The Twenty-Sixth Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad July 02, 2022
    • Colombia Votes in Its First Left Government by Vijay Prashad, Taroa Zúñiga Silva June 24, 2022
    • We Need to Build the Architecture of Our Future: The Twenty-Fifth Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad June 24, 2022
    • The lethality of Washington’s Global Monroe Doctrine: The Twenty-Fourth Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad June 17, 2022
  • Also By Vijay Prashad in Monthly Review Magazine

    • Africa Is on the Move May 01, 2022
    • Preface January 01, 2022
    • Introduction January 01, 2022
    • Quid Pro Quo? October 01, 2011
    • Reclaim the Neighborhood, Change the World December 01, 2007
    • Kathy Kelly’s Chispa December 01, 2005

    Books By Vijay Prashad

    • Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations September 16, 2020

    Monthly Review Essays

    • The Struggle between the Future and the Past: Where Is Cuba Going?
      Editor | Cuban Flag Museum of the Revolution Havana Cuba 2012 | MR Online

      I have 2 favourite sayings. One draws upon the dialogue in Shakespeare’s Henry the VI part 2 when Jack Cade envisions that the effect of his plot will be that “all the realm shall be in common.” To this, comrade Dick responds, “the first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

    Lost & Found

    • Russia and the Ukraine crisis: The Eurasian Project in conflict with the triad imperialist policies
      Samir Amin | State flag of Ukraine behind a wall of anonymous protesters in Kyiv Ukraine | MR Online

      We wanted to draw readers attention to this piece by Samir Amin, which was written at the time of the Maidan Coup in 2014. —Eds. 1. The current global stage is dominated by the attempt of historical centers of imperialism (the U.S., Western and Central Europe, Japan—hereafter called “the Triad”) to maintain their exclusive control […]

    Trending

    Popular (last 30 days)

    RSS MR Press News

    • New! ‘Work Work Work’ by Michael Yates (EXCERPTS) June 13, 2022
    • Listen: A book to refer to for years to come (“The Labor Guide to Retirement Plans” reviewed by ‘The People’s Voice’) June 13, 2022
    • James Boggs’ “The American Revolution: Pages from a Negro Workers Notebook” (Black Agenda Report excerpts Chapter 6) June 10, 2022
    • From the hard right and the political parties of Capital, to the crisis of centrism (Marxist Education Project features ‘Socialist Register’ 2022) June 9, 2022
    • The poisonous fruits of white supremacy: The rise of the right (Horne, on the De Facto Podcast) June 8, 2022

    RSS Climate & Capitalism

    • The Inequality Pandemic July 3, 2022
    • For ecosocialist degrowth July 2, 2022
    • Indigenous organizations in Peru declare state of emergency June 24, 2022
    • Ecosocialist Bookshelf, June 2022 June 9, 2022
    • A forgotten revolutionary: Thomas Spence on saving the commons June 4, 2022

    RSS Monthly Review

    • July-August 2022 (Volume 74, Number 3) July 1, 2022 The Editors
    • Socialism and Ecological Survival: An Introduction July 1, 2022 John Bellamy Foster
    • The Limits to Growth: Ecosocialism or Barbarism July 1, 2022 Alberto Garzón Espinosa
    • Surviving Through Community Building in Catastrophic Times July 1, 2022 Sit Tsui
    • Climate Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century July 1, 2022 Jayati Ghosh

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Creative Commons License

    Monthly Review Foundation
    134 W 29TH ST STE 706
    New York NY 10001-5304

    Tel: 212-691-2555