• Monthly Review
  • Monthly Review Press
  • MR (Castilian)
  • Climate & Capitalism
  • Money on the Left
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
MR Online
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact/Submission
  • Browse
    • Recent Articles Archive
    • by Subject
      • Ecology
      • Education
      • Imperialism
      • Inequality
      • Labor
      • Literature
      • Marxism
      • Movements
      • Philosophy
      • Political Economy
    • by Region
      • Africa
      • Americas
      • Asia
      • Australasia
      • Europe
      • Global
      • Middle East
    • by Category
      • Art
      • Commentary
      • Interview
      • Letter
      • News
      • Newswire
  • Monthly Review Essays
| Fuyuko Matsui Japan Becoming Friends with All the Children of the World 2004 | MR Online Fuyuko Matsui (Japan), Becoming Friends with All the Children of the World, 2004.

All that I ask is that you fight for peace today: The Thirtieth Newsletter (2022)

By Vijay Prashad (Posted Jul 29, 2022)

Originally published: Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research on July 28, 2022 (more by Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research)  |
Imperialism, Inequality, State Repression, WarEurope, Global, RussiaNewswireGas, Nord Stream 1 pipeline, Tricontinental Newsletter

Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

The fragility of Europe’s energy supply has once again been on display in recent months. Gas shipments through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which runs from Russia to Germany, were reduced to 40% of capacity in June, a cut that Moscow said was due to delays in the servicing of a turbine by the German firm Siemens. Shortly thereafter, on 11 July, the pipeline was taken offline for ten days for annual routine maintenance. Despite receiving assurances from Moscow that the supply would resume as scheduled, European leaders expressed feared that the shutdown would continue indefinitely in retaliation for sanctions imposed on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine. On 21 July, the flow of Russian gas into Europe resumed. Klaus Müller, the head Germany’s energy regulator, said that gas flows through Nord Stream 1 were below pre-maintenance levels during the first few hours of resumption, though they have now returned to 40% capacity.

European anxieties related to energy supply are linked to fears amongst the region’s governments of further instability in the Eurozone. On the same day that Nord Stream 1 resumed operations, Italy’s Mario Draghi resigned as prime minister, the latest in a dramatic series of resignations by heads of government in Bulgaria, Estonia, and the United Kingdom. Resistance from Europe to a peace agreement with Russia comes alongside recognition that trade with Russia is inevitable.

No Cold WarAt No Cold War, an international platform seeking to bring sanity to international relations, we have been closely observing the shifting tenor of the war in Ukraine and the U.S.-driven pressure campaign against China. We have published three previous briefings from this platform in our newsletters; below, you will find briefing no. 4, The World Does Not Want a Global NATO, which details the emerging clarity in the Global South regarding the U.S.-European attempt to drive a belligerent agenda around the world. This new clarity relates not only to the militarisation of the planet, but also to the deepening conflicts in trade and development, as evidenced by the G7’s new initiative, the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Development, which clearly targets China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

In June, member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) gathered in Madrid, Spain for their annual summit. At the meeting, NATO adopted a new Strategic Concept, which had last been updated in 2010. In it, NATO names Russia as its ‘most significant and direct threat’ and singled out China as a ‘challenge [to] our interests’. In the words of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, this guiding document represents a ‘fundamental shift’ for the military alliance, its ‘biggest overhaul… since the Cold War’.

A Monroe Doctrine for the 21st Century?

Pavel Pepperstein (Russia), Grandfather and Grandmother Are Long Gone, 2013.

Pavel Pepperstein (Russia), Grandfather and Grandmother Are Long Gone, 2013.

Although NATO purports to be a ‘defensive’ alliance, this claim is contradicted by its destructive legacy–such as in Serbia (1999), Afghanistan (2001), and Libya (2011)–and its ever-expanding global footprint. At the summit, NATO made it clear that it intends to continue its global expansion to confront Russia and China. Seemingly oblivious to the immense human suffering produced by the war in Ukraine, NATO declared that its ‘enlargement has been a historic success… and contributed to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area’, and extended official membership invitations to Finland and Sweden.

However, NATO’s sights extend far beyond the ‘Euro-Atlantic’ to the Global South. Seeking to gain a foothold in Asia, NATO welcomed Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand as summit participants for the first time and stated that ‘the Indo-Pacific is important for NATO’. On top of this, echoing the Monroe Doctrine (1823) of two hundred years ago, the Strategic Concept named ‘Africa and the Middle East’ as ‘NATO’s southern neighbourhood’, and Stoltenberg made an ominous reference to ‘Russia and China’s increasing influence in [the Alliance’s] southern neighbourhood’ as presenting a ‘challenge’.

85% of the World Seeks Peace

Although NATO’s member states may believe that they possess global authority, the overwhelming majority of the world does not. The international response to the war in Ukraine indicates that a stark divide exists between the United States and its closest allies on the one hand and the Global South on the other.

Governments representing 6.7 billion people–85% of the world’s population–have refused to follow sanctions imposed by the U.S. and its allies against Russia, while countries representing only 15% of the world’s population have followed these measures. According to Reuters, the only non-Western governments to have enacted sanctions on Russia are Japan, South Korea, the Bahamas, and Taiwan–all of which host U.S. military bases or personnel.

There is even less support for the push to close airspace to Russian planes spearheaded by the U.S. and European Union. Governments representing only 12% of the world’s population have adopted this policy, while 88% have not.

Tadesse Mesfin (Ethiopia), Pillars of Life: Harmony, 2018.

Tadesse Mesfin (Ethiopia), Pillars of Life: Harmony, 2018.

U.S.-led efforts to politically isolate Russia on the international stage have been unsuccessful. In March, the UN General Assembly voted on a nonbinding resolution to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: 141 countries voted in favour, 5 countries voted against, 35 countries abstained, and 12 countries were absent. However, this tally does not tell the full story. The countries which either voted against the resolution, abstained, or were absent represent 59% of the world’s population. Following this, the Biden administration’s call for Russia to be excluded from the G20 summit in Indonesia was ignored.

Meanwhile, despite intense backing from NATO, efforts to win support for Ukraine in the Global South have been a complete failure. On 20 June, after several requests, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the African Union; only two heads of state of the continental organisation’s 55 members attended the meeting. Shortly thereafter, Zelensky’s request to address the Latin American trade bloc, Mercosur, was rejected.

It is clear that NATO’s claim to be ‘a bulwark of the rules-based international order’ is not a view which is shared by most of the world. Support for the military alliance’s policies is almost entirely confined to its member countries and a handful of allies which together constitute a small minority of the world’s population. Most of the world’s population rejects NATO’s policies and global aspirations and does not wish to divide the international community into outdated Cold War blocs.

Bahadır Gökay (Turkey) Evvel (‘Before’), 2013.

Bahadır Gökay (Turkey) Evvel (‘Before’), 2013.

In 1955, ten years after the U.S. dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima (Japan), the Turkish poet Nâzim Hikmet wrote a poem in the voice of a seven-year-old girl who died in that terrible act. The poem was later translated into Japanese by Nobuyuki Nakamoto as ‘Shinda Onnanoko’ (‘Dead Girl’) and frequently sung in commemorations of that atrocity. Given the harshness of war and the escalation of conflict, it is worthwhile to reflect once more on Hikmet’s beautiful, haunting lyrics:

I come and stand at every door
But no one hears my silent tread.
I knock and yet remain unseen
For I am dead, for I am dead.

I’m only seven, although I died
In Hiroshima long ago.
I’m seven now as I was then.
When children die, they do not grow.

My hair was scorched by swirling flame.
My eyes grew dim; my eyes grew blind.
Death came and turned my bones to dust
And that was scattered by the wind.

I need no fruit, I need no rice.
I need no sweets, nor even bread.
I ask for nothing for myself
For I am dead, for I am dead.

All that I ask is that for peace
You fight today, you fight today
So that the children of the world
May live and grow and laugh and play.

Warmly,

Vijay

Monthly Review does not necessarily adhere to all of the views conveyed in articles republished at MR Online. Our goal is to share a variety of left perspectives that we think our readers will find interesting or useful. —Eds.

About Vijay Prashad

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than twenty books, including The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World (The New Press, 2007), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013), The Death of the Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016) and Red Star Over the Third World (LeftWord, 2017). He writes regularly for Frontline, the Hindu, Newsclick, AlterNet and BirGün.
Gas Nord Stream 1 pipeline Tricontinental Newsletter
Sanctions had no effect on Moscow yet Europe lost 4 governments: Orban
Argentina’s Evita: an indispensable legacy
  • Also by Vijay Prashad

    • Can we please have an adult conversation about China? by Vijay Prashad August 12, 2022
    • Sri Lankans seek a World in which they can find laughter together: The Thirty-First Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad August 05, 2022
    • All that I ask is that you fight for peace today: The Thirtieth Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad July 29, 2022
    • It is dark, but I sing because the morning will come: The Twenty-Ninth Newsletter (2022) by Vijay Prashad July 22, 2022
  • Also By Vijay Prashad in Monthly Review Magazine

    • Africa Is on the Move May 01, 2022
    • Preface January 01, 2022
    • Introduction January 01, 2022
    • Quid Pro Quo? October 01, 2011
    • Reclaim the Neighborhood, Change the World December 01, 2007
    • Kathy Kelly’s Chispa December 01, 2005

    Books By Vijay Prashad

    • Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations September 16, 2020

    Monthly Review Essays

    • From Commodity Fetishism to Teleological Positing: Lukács’s Concept of Labor and Its Relevance
      Wang Pu | Historia y conciencia de clase y el marxismo de Georg Lukács Dialektika | MR Online

      The concept of labor constituted a pivotal problematic in Georg Lukács’s theoretical development throughout his Marxist years.

    Lost & Found

    • Russia and the Ukraine crisis: The Eurasian Project in conflict with the triad imperialist policies
      Samir Amin | State flag of Ukraine behind a wall of anonymous protesters in Kyiv Ukraine | MR Online

      We wanted to draw readers attention to this piece by Samir Amin, which was written at the time of the Maidan Coup in 2014. —Eds. 1. The current global stage is dominated by the attempt of historical centers of imperialism (the U.S., Western and Central Europe, Japan—hereafter called “the Triad”) to maintain their exclusive control […]

    Trending

    Popular (last 30 days)

    RSS MR Press News

    • “The Return of Nature” wins ASA’s Paul Sweezy Outstanding Book Award August 11, 2022
    • Grappling with ‘Capital’s’ entirety: Not just for first-time readers (Heinrich reviewed by ‘Marx & Philosophy Review of Books’) August 10, 2022
    • Work work work – so a few can be rich (Yates published in “Counterpunch”) August 9, 2022
    • Rescuing Marx, and Marxism… (‘The Return of Nature’ reviewed by “Theory & Struggle”) August 1, 2022
    • WATCH “MR Conversations: Work Work Work,” with Michael Yates and Intan Suwandi (Plus: EXCERPTS) August 1, 2022

    RSS Climate & Capitalism

    • Ecosocialist Bookshelf, August 2022 August 14, 2022
    • Global hunger numbers jump; 2.3 billion are ‘food insecure’ August 9, 2022
    • U.S. has the warmest nights ever August 9, 2022
    • Tree Thieves: Crime and Survival in North America’s Woods August 5, 2022
    • Capitalism’s crimes against nature July 24, 2022

    RSS Monthly Review

    • July-August 2022 (Volume 74, Number 3) July 1, 2022 The Editors
    • Socialism and Ecological Survival: An Introduction July 1, 2022 John Bellamy Foster
    • The Limits to Growth: Ecosocialism or Barbarism July 1, 2022 Alberto Garzón Espinosa
    • Surviving Through Community Building in Catastrophic Times July 1, 2022 Sit Tsui
    • Climate Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century July 1, 2022 Jayati Ghosh

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Creative Commons License

    Monthly Review Foundation
    134 W 29TH ST STE 706
    New York NY 10001-5304

    Tel: 212-691-2555