-
The U.S. military’s fatal stance on climate change
The Pentagon is preparing to wage war in a warmer world, even as it accelerates it.
-
Mission impossible? Quantifying military emissions
Military and wartime emissions are difficult to track—but too important to ignore.
-
A blind spot in climate models: Slower tree growth in a warming world
A new study suggests climate models may be overestimating how much carbon forests will absorb in a warming world, raising the possibility that global temperatures could rise even more than current projections anticipate.
-
Mirror life is a mass-extinction risk we don’t need to take
In 2024, dozens of prominent researchers wrote an article in Science that introduced the world to a dizzying concept: the existential perils of so-called “mirror-life,” a type of organism based on molecular structures not found on Earth.
-
The defense revolving-door, Silicon Valley edition
An eye-opening glimpse at the links between two congressional committees and more than 100 defense contractors, consultants, and lobbyists.
-
Before the next nuclear crisis, listen to those who lived through the last one
The nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in the deaths and fatal injuries of more than 210,000 people, who either died instantaneously or within months.
-
American Nero: Why Trump is trying to burn down the National Academy of Sciences
It’s said that Nero fiddled while Rome burned.
-
The rise of the military-technology complex
How Silicon Valley tech firms remade U.S. defense contracting. And then opened the Pentagon’s checkbook—wide.
-
Trump administration signs a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia—and risks a Middle East arms race
On Thursday, President Trump said, in a new twist, that the U.S.-Saudi nuclear agreement would be “totally subject to” the kingdom joining the Abraham Accords.
-
Why the National Science Foundation is ripping monitoring instruments out of the ocean
The announcement followed the abrupt dismissal of the entire National Science Board, the advisory committee to the National Science Foundation.
-
‘Earth in flames,’ Brian Toon and Alan Robock on whether humans will die from an asteroid or nuclear war first
Earth scientists Brian Toon and Alan Robock discuss their latest book on nuclear winter, “Earth in Flames” (Oxford University Press, 2025).
-
‘Like a timebomb’: New study says New Orleans could be underwater by 2100
According to the new research paper, the loss of the sediment diversion plan “effectively means giving up on extensive portions of coastal Louisiana, including the New Orleans area”.
-
‘It’s just madness’: Trump administration to close three-quarters of Forest Service research stations
“We’re not finished learning about how to manage public lands, and this action, it kind of indicates that we’re done learning,” said Elizabeth Leger.
-
Unready for war, AI may already be causing deadly mistakes
Anyone who cares about humanity should be deeply concerned.
-
Fukushima at 15
Living with radioactive hot spots and stigma as Japan’s government pushes for more reactors.
-
Deny, delay, downplay: How governments hide climate change intelligence
When nations with well-resourced intelligence gathering services, like the United Kingdom and Australia, choose to shield their citizens from the very real impacts of planetary warming and ecological disruption, they risk aligning themselves with climate denialism efforts like those occurring in the United States, such as current National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard’s decision to excise any mention of climate change from the spy community’s most recent Annual Threat Assessment.
-
Trump’s new radiation exposure limits could be ‘catastrophic’ for women and girls
In a May executive order, aimed at ushering in what he described as an “American nuclear renaissance,” President Donald Trump declared moot the science underpinning decades-old radiation exposure standards set by the federal government. Executive Order 14300 directed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to conduct a “wholesale revision” of half-a-century of guidance and regulations. In […]
-
The experts respond to Trump’s proposal to “start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis”
Just in case Trump is indeed talking about testing a nuclear explosive device, now is probably a good time to look back at the Bulletin’s March 2024 issue, “A return to nuclear testing?”, which lays out the many negative impacts of nuclear testing.
-
A conversation with Kathryn Bigelow, director of ‘A House of Dynamite,’ and screenwriter Noah Oppenheim
In the pantheon of movies about nuclear catastrophe, the emotional power of A House of Dynamite is rivalled, to my way of thinking, only by Fail Safe, in which Henry Fonda, as an American president, must drop the bomb on New York City to atone for a mistaken U.S. attack on Moscow and stave off all-out nuclear war.
-
Michael Mann to Bill Gates: You can’t reboot the planet if you crash it
“I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.” Thus wrote the famous psychologist Abraham Maslow in 1966.
